O S A H    P R O J E C T S   
 
GENTERRA
CUEJACK
EYE/MACHINE
MINDS OF CONCERN::
BREAKING NEWS

TRACENOIZER
ANTI-WARGAME
FREE RADIO LINUX
CARNIVORE
SUPERCHANNEL
AMNESIA
PRETTY GOOD PRIVACY

  O S A H    C O N T E X T   
_What is OSAH?
_Conversation: Jenny Marketou and Steve Dietz
_Josephine Berry, "Bare Code: Net Art and the Free Software Movement"
_Micz Flor, "Hear Me Out: Free Radio Linux broadcasts the Linux sources on air and online
_OSAH Press
_Bibliography
_Quotes

  C R E D I T S  



NetArtCommons


  
Public_Domain:

Commons-law@sarai.net mailing list
posted by steve on Monday May 06, @07:51PM   

Sarai New Media Initiative in Delhi is organizing a new list that focuses on legal issues related to the public domain. The Commons-law@sarai.net mailing list seeks to build a community interested in that real and imagined space called the Public Domain or the Commons.
"The public domain as a space of cultural practice has been a contested space, and it is only fairly recently that a serious sociological and/or political analysis is being attempted. Some of our concerns lie in examining what are the various practices that go into the formation of this public domain, and how they interact with each other over the contested meaning associated with the idea of a public domain."
More about this list. General information about the mailing list is at: http://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/commons-law

Welcome to the Commons-law@sarai.net mailing list! This list seeks to build a community interested in that real and imagined space called the Public Domain or the Commons.

The public domain as a space of cultural practice has been a contested space, and it is only fairly recently that a serious sociological and/or political analysis is being attempted. Some of our concerns lie in examining what are the various practices that go into the formation of this public domain, and how they interact with each other over the contested meaning associated with the idea of a public domain.

It is our belief that law is one such constitutive discourse of the public domain. By a constitutive discourse we mean that the law does not merely describe the public domain, but through such description also constitutes what the public domain is and should be. The very idea of law and legal systems are predicated on the imaginary notion of the Idea(l) of the public itself. Is there then a discrepancy between the law's idea of the public and the political/ cultural practices of this public?

What we would like to do is collectively chart out an examination of the nature of this public domain by critically examining the role that intellectual property rights play in constituting the public domain. It is clear that rights bestowed by intellectual property regimes (copyright, trademark, publicity rights, design, patents, and associated merchandising rights in particular) play a crucial role in the creation of contemporary cultures and in the social life of interpretive practice.

There has been no account in India of the cultural nature of the actual forms that intellectual property laws protect, the social and historical contexts in which cultural proprietorship is (or is not) assumed, and the manner in which these rights are (or are not) exercised and enforced to intervene in everyday struggles over meaning. We hope that a study of the political consequences of intellectual property rights in a democratic society will provide for a more specific and material account of the power/ knowledge relationship that underlies the idea of intellectual property law.

Some of the issues that we would then like to examine include the following.

1. IPR, the public domain and Freedom of speech and expression - Traditionally the right to freedom of speech and expression has been exercised and regulated within the constitutional narrative of the nation state. There are increasing instances in the context of globalization of the use of IPR to restrict this freedom through a control over the signs of popular culture. What are the ways in which this public domain is shrinking as a result of the operation of the IPR regime? What are the counter hegemonic instances of the use of protected signs and how does the legal category of fair use and parody defenses negotiate with such usage?

2. IPR and traditional knowledge resources - If there is a shirking of the idea of the public domain or the commons in the modern urban economy, there seems to be a dual move which is of some interest vis a vis cultures and economies outside the sphere of modernity. The philosophical basis of IPR finds its familial lineage within the larger account of a particular project of modernity. How does such a modern account of IPR interact with "non-modern" accounts of knowledge and property, especially in the context of IPR and traditional knowledge. In the context of globalization there are serious threats posed to the idea of traditional commons by the onslaught of global interest in capturing forms of traditional knowledge and converting it into proprietary information. What are the politics of such conversions of common knowledge into individual information and what legal strategies may we adopt to protect this realm?

3. Challenges to traditional notions of IPR posed by new technologies - The internet and movements like the open source movement have greatly challenged traditional notions of property, authorship, originality and ownership. What do these challenges mean for our understanding of IPR, and what alternate accounts of IPR are required to be able to argue for a larger notion of the public domain or commons in the context of IPR.

4. Expanding the realm of the Public/Commons - Deriving our inspiration from the open source movement in software, we are interested in studying the implications of an expansion of the idea of the commons or the public domain by similar social movements in the form of open technologies, open art and open law. What, for instance, are the preconditions to retaining the openness of the concept of open source?

We see ourselves as legal practitioners and researchers who see law as a culturally mediated discourse in which various processes and systems of domination and resistance coexist. We also recognize that any successful attempt at exploring the nexus of law and culture will have to have the ability to transcend and transform the initial categories viz. law and culture. We are therefore using this space in a hope that we will be able to muster up fellow travelers from different fields to enrich this project.

List Administrators: Lawrence Liang Sudhir Krishnaswamy Jeebesh Bagchi (Sarai)

To post to this list, send your email to: commons-law@sarai.net

General information about the mailing list is at:
http://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/commons-law
Sarai New Media Initiative

OSAH PRESS | Wired interview Dietz-Marketou  >

 

 
  NetArt Commons L O G I N   
Nickname:

Password:

[ Create a new account ]

  R E L A T E D _ L I N K S   
  • NetArtCommons
  • http://mail.sarai.net/mailman/ listinfo/commons-law
  • Sarai New Media Initiative
  • More about this list
  • More on Public_Domain
  • Also by steve

  • This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Commons-law@sarai.net mailing list | Login/Create an Account | Top | Search Discussion
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

    Ornithology is for the birds as criticism is for the artists. -- trude. ;-)

    [ home | about NetArtCommons | about OSAH | contribute story | preferences ]